Skip to Main Content

view additional image 1
View in a Room ArtworkView in a Room Background
Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opportunities for advancement. It's about attention.

What were the times when men hunted mammoths and pulled their women by the hair in or out of their cave, most likely with an immensely powerful Fred Flintstone club in their luggage. The man built the pyramids with his bare hands, opened up the world's oceans only with a tiny compass needle, urbanized entire continents and ensured law and order in the Wild West. Piff paff. He healed the flu and the penis envy, flew to the moon and jumped back to earth with a parachute. And why all this? Because he can! And, of course, to distinguish yourself and then look for recognition in the woman's lap.
And now, thanks to feminism, all those heroic deeds are only acknowledged with a tired smile because the women have taken the scepter into their own manicured hands? Of course that's a little depressing.
One should assume that after successful emancipation, both genders have finally reconciled. But far from it: After years of insecurity due to the strengthened women, the men's world has probably taken some courage in a corresponding self-help group and is fighting back against the male-hostile excesses of the impending matriarchy. They fight against the apparent preference for women in the educational area, in education policy and in custody. But less with constructive arguments, or for my part, by pounding the fist on the table or against their now hairless chest to remind us that they invented fire, the wheel and humanism. No, they do what they do best: they whine.
For a long time, an unwritten law was in force in this country to ensure the social coexistence of men and women. Accordingly, women should accept disadvantages on the other side for all privileges that are inherent to them (breasts) (reduction to the same). However, since ardent feminists have been campaigning for their rights, for example by accusing their male boss of sexual harassment at work, men have judged themselves to be deferred. They feel that the supposedly balanced relationship between man and woman is given up by emancipation from one side.

Understandably, the men's rights movement in turn now demands equality for women in everything else that brings them disadvantages. And even if military service can only be started voluntarily by both sexes, there is still work to be done on the construction site, underground, or cleaning the city. And of course, strong and beautiful genders would have to share the bitterly contested places in the lifeboat fairly with one another or at least pee for it at the next sinking of the Titanic.There can be no winners in this more than stupid gender adjustment debate, for the simple reason that men and women are not the same. And it is the basic mistake of this discussion to want to make pears out of apples - or the other way around. In this way, men and women will continue to rub themselves off because they are too busy trying to envy each others supposed “privileges” and spreading resentment. Instead of making the best of togetherness, waking up together, for example, fathering children or listening to eight-part choratoriums.

I chose to copy this paragraph because it explains my artwork very well and my position on this subject.


Author Konstantin Sakkas.
Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opportunities for advancement. It's about attention.

What were the times when men hunted mammoths and pulled their women by the hair in or out of their cave, most likely with an immensely powerful Fred Flintstone club in their luggage. The man built the pyramids with his bare hands, opened up the world's oceans only with a tiny compass needle, urbanized entire continents and ensured law and order in the Wild West. Piff paff. He healed the flu and the penis envy, flew to the moon and jumped back to earth with a parachute. And why all this? Because he can! And, of course, to distinguish yourself and then look for recognition in the woman's lap.
And now, thanks to feminism, all those heroic deeds are only acknowledged with a tired smile because the women have taken the scepter into their own manicured hands? Of course that's a little depressing.
One should assume that after successful emancipation, both genders have finally reconciled. But far from it: After years of insecurity due to the strengthened women, the men's world has probably taken some courage in a corresponding self-help group and is fighting back against the male-hostile excesses of the impending matriarchy. They fight against the apparent preference for women in the educational area, in education policy and in custody. But less with constructive arguments, or for my part, by pounding the fist on the table or against their now hairless chest to remind us that they invented fire, the wheel and humanism. No, they do what they do best: they whine.
For a long time, an unwritten law was in force in this country to ensure the social coexistence of men and women. Accordingly, women should accept disadvantages on the other side for all privileges that are inherent to them (breasts) (reduction to the same). However, since ardent feminists have been campaigning for their rights, for example by accusing their male boss of sexual harassment at work, men have judged themselves to be deferred. They feel that the supposedly balanced relationship between man and woman is given up by emancipation from one side.

Understandably, the men's rights movement in turn now demands equality for women in everything else that brings them disadvantages. And even if military service can only be started voluntarily by both sexes, there is still work to be done on the construction site, underground, or cleaning the city. And of course, strong and beautiful genders would have to share the bitterly contested places in the lifeboat fairly with one another or at least pee for it at the next sinking of the Titanic.There can be no winners in this more than stupid gender adjustment debate, for the simple reason that men and women are not the same. And it is the basic mistake of this discussion to want to make pears out of apples - or the other way around. In this way, men and women will continue to rub themselves off because they are too busy trying to envy each others supposed “privileges” and spreading resentment. Instead of making the best of togetherness, waking up together, for example, fathering children or listening to eight-part choratoriums.

I chose to copy this paragraph because it explains my artwork very well and my position on this subject.


Author Konstantin Sakkas.
Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opportunities for advancement. It's about attention.

What were the times when men hunted mammoths and pulled their women by the hair in or out of their cave, most likely with an immensely powerful Fred Flintstone club in their luggage. The man built the pyramids with his bare hands, opened up the world's oceans only with a tiny compass needle, urbanized entire continents and ensured law and order in the Wild West. Piff paff. He healed the flu and the penis envy, flew to the moon and jumped back to earth with a parachute. And why all this? Because he can! And, of course, to distinguish yourself and then look for recognition in the woman's lap.
And now, thanks to feminism, all those heroic deeds are only acknowledged with a tired smile because the women have taken the scepter into their own manicured hands? Of course that's a little depressing.
One should assume that after successful emancipation, both genders have finally reconciled. But far from it: After years of insecurity due to the strengthened women, the men's world has probably taken some courage in a corresponding self-help group and is fighting back against the male-hostile excesses of the impending matriarchy. They fight against the apparent preference for women in the educational area, in education policy and in custody. But less with constructive arguments, or for my part, by pounding the fist on the table or against their now hairless chest to remind us that they invented fire, the wheel and humanism. No, they do what they do best: they whine.
For a long time, an unwritten law was in force in this country to ensure the social coexistence of men and women. Accordingly, women should accept disadvantages on the other side for all privileges that are inherent to them (breasts) (reduction to the same). However, since ardent feminists have been campaigning for their rights, for example by accusing their male boss of sexual harassment at work, men have judged themselves to be deferred. They feel that the supposedly balanced relationship between man and woman is given up by emancipation from one side.

Understandably, the men's rights movement in turn now demands equality for women in everything else that brings them disadvantages. And even if military service can only be started voluntarily by both sexes, there is still work to be done on the construction site, underground, or cleaning the city. And of course, strong and beautiful genders would have to share the bitterly contested places in the lifeboat fairly with one another or at least pee for it at the next sinking of the Titanic.There can be no winners in this more than stupid gender adjustment debate, for the simple reason that men and women are not the same. And it is the basic mistake of this discussion to want to make pears out of apples - or the other way around. In this way, men and women will continue to rub themselves off because they are too busy trying to envy each others supposed “privileges” and spreading resentment. Instead of making the best of togetherness, waking up together, for example, fathering children or listening to eight-part choratoriums.

I chose to copy this paragraph because it explains my artwork very well and my position on this subject.


Author Konstantin Sakkas.
Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opportunities for advancement. It's about attention.

What were the times when men hunted mammoths and pulled their women by the hair in or out of their cave, most likely with an immensely powerful Fred Flintstone club in their luggage. The man built the pyramids with his bare hands, opened up the world's oceans only with a tiny compass needle, urbanized entire continents and ensured law and order in the Wild West. Piff paff. He healed the flu and the penis envy, flew to the moon and jumped back to earth with a parachute. And why all this? Because he can! And, of course, to distinguish yourself and then look for recognition in the woman's lap.
And now, thanks to feminism, all those heroic deeds are only acknowledged with a tired smile because the women have taken the scepter into their own manicured hands? Of course that's a little depressing.
One should assume that after successful emancipation, both genders have finally reconciled. But far from it: After years of insecurity due to the strengthened women, the men's world has probably taken some courage in a corresponding self-help group and is fighting back against the male-hostile excesses of the impending matriarchy. They fight against the apparent preference for women in the educational area, in education policy and in custody. But less with constructive arguments, or for my part, by pounding the fist on the table or against their now hairless chest to remind us that they invented fire, the wheel and humanism. No, they do what they do best: they whine.
For a long time, an unwritten law was in force in this country to ensure the social coexistence of men and women. Accordingly, women should accept disadvantages on the other side for all privileges that are inherent to them (breasts) (reduction to the same). However, since ardent feminists have been campaigning for their rights, for example by accusing their male boss of sexual harassment at work, men have judged themselves to be deferred. They feel that the supposedly balanced relationship between man and woman is given up by emancipation from one side.

Understandably, the men's rights movement in turn now demands equality for women in everything else that brings them disadvantages. And even if military service can only be started voluntarily by both sexes, there is still work to be done on the construction site, underground, or cleaning the city. And of course, strong and beautiful genders would have to share the bitterly contested places in the lifeboat fairly with one another or at least pee for it at the next sinking of the Titanic.There can be no winners in this more than stupid gender adjustment debate, for the simple reason that men and women are not the same. And it is the basic mistake of this discussion to want to make pears out of apples - or the other way around. In this way, men and women will continue to rub themselves off because they are too busy trying to envy each others supposed “privileges” and spreading resentment. Instead of making the best of togetherness, waking up together, for example, fathering children or listening to eight-part choratoriums.

I chose to copy this paragraph because it explains my artwork very well and my position on this subject.


Author Konstantin Sakkas.
Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opportunities for advancement. It's about attention.

What were the times when men hunted mammoths and pulled their women by the hair in or out of their cave, most likely with an immensely powerful Fred Flintstone club in their luggage. The man built the pyramids with his bare hands, opened up the world's oceans only with a tiny compass needle, urbanized entire continents and ensured law and order in the Wild West. Piff paff. He healed the flu and the penis envy, flew to the moon and jumped back to earth with a parachute. And why all this? Because he can! And, of course, to distinguish yourself and then look for recognition in the woman's lap.
And now, thanks to feminism, all those heroic deeds are only acknowledged with a tired smile because the women have taken the scepter into their own manicured hands? Of course that's a little depressing.
One should assume that after successful emancipation, both genders have finally reconciled. But far from it: After years of insecurity due to the strengthened women, the men's world has probably taken some courage in a corresponding self-help group and is fighting back against the male-hostile excesses of the impending matriarchy. They fight against the apparent preference for women in the educational area, in education policy and in custody. But less with constructive arguments, or for my part, by pounding the fist on the table or against their now hairless chest to remind us that they invented fire, the wheel and humanism. No, they do what they do best: they whine.
For a long time, an unwritten law was in force in this country to ensure the social coexistence of men and women. Accordingly, women should accept disadvantages on the other side for all privileges that are inherent to them (breasts) (reduction to the same). However, since ardent feminists have been campaigning for their rights, for example by accusing their male boss of sexual harassment at work, men have judged themselves to be deferred. They feel that the supposedly balanced relationship between man and woman is given up by emancipation from one side.

Understandably, the men's rights movement in turn now demands equality for women in everything else that brings them disadvantages. And even if military service can only be started voluntarily by both sexes, there is still work to be done on the construction site, underground, or cleaning the city. And of course, strong and beautiful genders would have to share the bitterly contested places in the lifeboat fairly with one another or at least pee for it at the next sinking of the Titanic.There can be no winners in this more than stupid gender adjustment debate, for the simple reason that men and women are not the same. And it is the basic mistake of this discussion to want to make pears out of apples - or the other way around. In this way, men and women will continue to rub themselves off because they are too busy trying to envy each others supposed “privileges” and spreading resentment. Instead of making the best of togetherness, waking up together, for example, fathering children or listening to eight-part choratoriums.

I chose to copy this paragraph because it explains my artwork very well and my position on this subject.


Author Konstantin Sakkas.

1232 Views

132

View In My Room

"Gender fight" Painting

Maxim Fomenko

Germany

Painting, Acrylic on Canvas

Size: 51.2 W x 70.9 H x 1.2 D in

Ships in a Crate

SOLD
Originally listed for $15,450

1232 Views

132

Artist Recognition
link - Featured in One to Watch

Featured in One to Watch

link - Featured in the Catalog

Featured in the Catalog

link - Showed at the The Other Art Fair

Showed at the The Other Art Fair

link - Artist featured in a collection

Artist featured in a collection

ABOUT THE ARTWORK
DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS
SHIPPING AND RETURNS

Gender equality is a utopia. And not a very nice one. Because in the tiresome debate about who enjoys what privileges in society as a whole and if so, how many and why I don't, men and women like to start the same argument over and over again. It's about who has an easier life, who has better opport...

Year Created:

2020

Subject:
Medium:

Painting, Acrylic on Canvas

Rarity:

One-of-a-kind Artwork

Size:

51.2 W x 70.9 H x 1.2 D in

Ready to Hang:

Yes

Frame:

Not applicable

Authenticity:

Certificate is Included

Packaging:

Ships in a Crate

Delivery Cost:

Shipping is included in price.

Delivery Time:

Typically 5-7 business days for domestic shipments, 10-14 business days for international shipments.

Returns:

14-day return policy. Visit our help section for more information.

Handling:

Ships in a wooden crate for additional protection of heavy or oversized artworks. Artists are responsible for packaging and adhering to Saatchi Art’s packaging guidelines.

Ships From:

Germany.

Customs:

Shipments from Germany may experience delays due to country's regulations for exporting valuable artworks.

Need more information?

Need more information?

Maxim Fomenko is a Russian-born contemporary artist known for his vibrant and abstract approach to portraiture. He draws heavily from modernist masters like Picasso, Francis Bacon, and David Hockney, but brings his own playful and provocative style into the mix. His work often features distorted faces, sometimes incorporating surreal elements like replacing eyes with abstract forms, creating a disorienting, psychedelic effect that blurs the line between humor and discomfort. Fomenko’s paintings typically explore identity and the human condition, touching on themes of beauty, death, and artistic legacy. His use of bright, often neon colors gives his work a dynamic, modern edge, while the distorted figures invite the viewer to question their own perceptions of self and others. This blend of abstraction and figuration is reminiscent of Bacon's explorations of the human form, but Fomenko adds a more playful, less brutal twist to his subjects. His series of works dedicated to figures like Alfred Hitchcock and Pablo Picasso showcase his fascination with both the celebrity and the inner life of the artist, while his "melting faces" series delves into the existential struggles of modern creatives. Fomenko reflects on the pressures artists face today, especially in the wake of historical giants, questioning what it means to be a creator in a world where everything seems to have already been said. Fomenko’s art has been exhibited across Europe and is included in prestigious collections such as the Bavarian State collection in Germany. His works have a global appeal, capturing the attention of collectors and galleries alike for their bold colors, thought-provoking content, and unique visual style. Fomenko's playful yet deep exploration of identity, art history, and modern existence makes him a significant contemporary artist whose work continually evolves while staying rooted in timeless artistic questions​.

Artist Recognition
Featured in One to Watch

Featured in Saatchi Art's curated series, One To Watch

Featured in the Catalog

Featured in Saatchi Art's printed catalog, sent to thousands of art collectors

Showed at the The Other Art Fair

Handpicked to show at The Other Art Fair presented by Saatchi Art in Bristol, Virtual

Artist featured in a collection

Artist featured by Saatchi Art in a collection

Thousands of 5-Star Reviews

We deliver world-class customer service to all of our art buyers.

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Our 14-day satisfaction guarantee allows you to buy with confidence.

Global Selection of Emerging Art

Explore an unparalleled artwork selection by artists from around the world.

Support An Artist With Every Purchase

We pay our artists more on every sale than other galleries.